> Olive wrote: >> non DFSG-free. Debian legal is only a mailing list to discuss licenses, by >> no means it is a tribunal that can take official decision. Only the ftp >> masters or a vote can decide litigious cases.
Uh, litigious cases get decided by a court presumably. "Contentious" might be the word you're looking for... On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:56:40PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > And whom do the ftp-masters themselves answer to? Quis custodiet ipsos > custodes? Debian is answerable to the public, you know. No, Debian's answerable to its members, which is the "or a vote" option above. The only senses in which Debian's answerable to the public is by people using other distros instead, or getting courts/police/whatever to force us to (not) do things. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
