On 9/16/07, Olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But why someone will want to do that? To put DRM and at the same time to
> provide someone with the possibility of bypassing them seems absurd.
> Could you give a /realistic/ example of a comportment that you think
> should be allowed and is nevertheless restricted.
There are issues with certain devices (e.g. game consoles, some media
players) that will only play files in their proprietary DRM-encumbered
format. So, parallel distribution would give recipients one copy they
could play on their DRM-using player, and one copy they could edit on
a PC.
--
Andrew Donnellan <><
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
http://linux.org.au http://debian.org
Spammers only === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
