Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, this is because *your* MUA is broken. The Mail-Followup-To header is > not a standard of any kind, which is why only a handful of (broken) MUAs > implement it. And I mean broken, because it should be named X-Something > until it gets standardized.
It is unfair to say those MUAs are broken. In the update of RFC 822 the stuff regarding X- were removed in RFC 2822. Experience is that it causes interop failures when moving an experimental X- header into a non-experimental header. /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
