On 01/09/07 09:16, Francesco Poli wrote: > "CC in any form"?!? > Even CC licenses with ND and/or NC elements?!? > > I really doubt the DFSG were written with the intentions of forbidding > modifications (see DFSG#3) or commercial use (see DFSG#6). > Are we talking of the *same* DFSG?
Yes I think so :) >>> I'm sorry to say this, but I don't think the current drafts are >>> DFSG-free and I have few hopes that the finat texts will be >>> substantially different from the current drafts. >>> >>> See >>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/10/msg00167.html >>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-November/004472.html >>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-December/004779.html >>> for further details. >> Well, these are a bit extreme I think. I'm not finding the arguments >> convincing. > > Can you please provide a convincing rebuttal of my arguments? I just dropped another email a few minutes ago about the same time you sent this with a bit more on the subject so we can continue this thread there. Enjoy, Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
