On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:08:19PM -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
> On 01/08/07 18:43, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:02:02PM -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
> >> That's good, I'm not convinced that CC in any form isn't DFSG. :)
> >> It seems to me the CC is written with the same kind of mentality and
> >> intentions that the DFSG was written.
> >>
> > Well, any non-commercial variant of the CC is a clear violation of DFSG
> > #6 ("No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor").
>
> Yes, I understand that. As a guideline, the DFSG is for the purposes
> of advancing the free software movement. I don't know why the Creative
> Commons guys added that option, but perhaps there was some really good
> reason for when it needs to be used.
>
> All I'm saying is that it's use needs to be evaluated when someone
> might choose to use it. I agree that I can't think of a valid use, but
> I'm not comfortable saying that I've ruled out the possibility that
> some valid use exists.
>
> JeffOK. I misread your statement as something akin to "all CC variants are DFSG-compliant." On closer inspection, that is clearly not what you said :-) Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
