On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 05:56:55PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > I also think that this would be good to try and add to the DFSG. I > think it would make a position we've tacidly had here on -legal much > more clear than it is now.
I think it derives directly from DFSG#1--certainly the spirit, even if the letter is debated. I think adding new guidelines that are subsets of existing ones would set a very bad precedent, since it implies that the DFSG is to be read literally, as a set of rules, instead of a set of guidelines. -- Glenn Maynard
