Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The test itself, though, remains clear: Any requirement for sending >>source modifications to anyone other than the recipient of the >>modified binary---in fact any forced distribution at all, beyond >>giving source to those who receive a copy of the binary -- is non >>free. > > Why does it not say this, rather than rambling about dissidents?
It does say that. I was quoting the core of the dissident test from the excellent DFSG FAQ. It talks about dissidents to provide a framework in which to consider that rule, and an experiment for thinking about what that rule means and represents. -Brian -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
