>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't necessarily object to the point that the dissident test
>> is trying to make (not that I necessarily agree with it), but I
>> do object to its phrasing. It's obviously more concerned with
>> banning forced distribution of source than it is with the
>> safety of dissidents. It should just be replaced with "Forced
>> distribution of source to anyone other than the recipient is
>> non-free", and then we can have a nice big argument about
>> whether that should be in the DFSG or not.
Steve> Sounds good.
I also think that this would be good to try and add to the DFSG. I
think it would make a position we've tacidly had here on -legal much
more clear than it is now.
--Sam
