David B Harris said: > On 28 Aug 2003 03:22:47 +0100 > Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -(which makes passes at compilers) written >> +(which makes passes at compilers) written > > I agree that this is an ambiguous case; one side would want to convince > the judge that the user was the one making the modification. The other > side would want to convince the judge that it was the copyright holder > distributing the new file, using their distribution method of choice.
If a Debian maintainer applies the patch to their local CVS mirror, are they creating a different invariant section? Since the GFDL does not allow distributers to modify or remove invariant sections, wouldn't we have to distribute the old (with trailing whitespace) invariant section also? --Joe
