On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 10:25, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:22:47AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > the difference is in the trailing whitespace, but that's irrelevant. > > No, it's relevant. In the section you quote: > > > L. Preserve all the Invariant Sections of the Document, > > unaltered > > in their text and in their titles. Section numbers or > > the > > equivalent are not considered part of the section titles. > > it says "unaltered in their text and in their titles". It says nothing > about preserving formatting or markup.
So it's non-infringing for a malicious person to design a font that's basically garbage (albeit unique garbage for each character), and make the GNU Manifesto display in that font. Or would this count as obscuring the document? What if I just chose a really really hard to read font? Now I *really* don't see the point of invariant sections. Either you can do a simple cipher of them and not infringe, or you have to use the highest quality fonts and printing methods available... -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
