Frank Mittelbach writes: > for the sake of an argument, what about > > 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message > that it isn't the original package > > 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be > used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages > without making any other processing changes, you must use that. > > i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your > concern?
as a ps: i already suggested yesterday: it it helps one could probably make that even more explicit in 5.a.2 by adding something like explicitly restricts it to facilities those only functions are to pass information to the user. /it it/if it/s /like/that/s
