On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Henning Makholm wrote: > AFAIU, what the authors of the LPPL draft is trying to express is > nothing more or less than > > 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message > that it isn't Standard LaTeX.
Would it be possible to use GPL wording for this? The ability NOT to do this when written for non-interactive use is important. > 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be > used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages > to the screen, you must use that. I'll need more thought about this. A requirement to use a specified facility seems unfree to me at first sniff, but I could (yet again) be reading too much into it. -- Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.dagon.net/>
