Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > for the sake of an argument, what about > > 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message > that it isn't the original package > > 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be > used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages > without making any other processing changes, you must use that. > > i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your > concern?
I'd prefer just saying that the documentation must make clear what the provenance is.
