Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes: > Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > for the sake of an argument, what about > > > > 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message > > that it isn't the original package > > > > 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be > > used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages > > without making any other processing changes, you must use that. > > > > i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your > > concern? > > I'd prefer just saying that the documentation must make clear what the > provenance is.
I take this as a yes, though you do not like it, correct?
