Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > The claim is that: > > Dissident test + Practical objections == Can't close the ASP loophole > > and, furthermore that that equality goes both ways. That is that > the Dissident test is just another way of saying that the only ways > you're allowed to close the ASP loophole are ones which are practically > unreasonable.
Sorry, when I say I agree with this claim, I mean the => direction. The <= direction is surely false; for example, I formulated the dissident test long before the ASP loophole (of any sort) had ever been pointed out to me.
