Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > Or else stop fudging around the topic. > > The claim is that: > > Dissident test + Practical objections == Can't close the ASP loophole > > and, furthermore that that equality goes both ways. That is that > the Dissident test is just another way of saying that the only ways > you're allowed to close the ASP loophole are ones which are practically > unreasonable.
I'm not fudging, I'm saying that, in all the cases I've thought about, I agree with your claim. I can't make statements about cases that I haven't thought about.
