Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:42:34AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > > > If your program is not distributed to anyone, then the license cannot > > > require you to distribute it to anyone (no matter how many people > > > use it or for what purpose, etc). > > > Which is to say that, if accepted, the Dissident test and the practical > > > concerns we have about providing source over SMS and such, imply that > > > no free license can ever close the ASP loophole. > > Since there are fifteen things floating around, each of which gets > > called "the ASP loophole", it's hard to be certain. > > Name one that it doesn't apply to?
Of the ones that I've seen, as far as I can tell, it would apply to all the proposed methods of "closing the ASP loophole".
