Am So, den 18.04.2004 schrieb Michael Banck um 17:19:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:27:29PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > What about the official logo?
> >
> > (not sure whether that's allowed, you'd have to check it)
>
> As long as we take the 'normal' swirl above the vase and not the hideous
> swirl the 'official official' logo has, it's fine with me. Even more so,
> it makes a lot of sense, thinking about it. Having the name 'Debian' is
> also alright.
Why not the "free" Debian swirl? I think its value of reconnaisance
("Wiederekennungswert" - sry) is higher than the "official official"
logo since all of the community projects use and spread word about it.
Additionally a large "debian" maybe with the official logo below on the
back would doubtlessly sign the staff wearing them as "the right"
representatives to talk to.
Btw: I haven't registered yet as a booth volunteer at joey's (will do so
asap), but I'll be at lt2k4 at least from Thursday (maybe already
Wednesday) up to Sunday. I'd like to listen to one or the other speech
and probably visiting one or the other booth but I'd volunteer for the
remaining time (approx. 2 days).
Best regards,
Daniel
P.S.: Anybody here willing to proof-read one or both of my speeches for
lt2k4? (Especially grammar and orthography are expected to be cruel... )
I already asked at d-i10n-en but received no valuable respone.
--
Daniel E. Atencio Psille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
