On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:00:27 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Given that the "upstream" branch name cames from the git-buildpackage and > that it's git-buildpackage which introduced "upstreamvcs", it seems fair > to me to standardize on this name.
In theory, yes. In pratice, quoting myself: | As a data point, the Debian Perl Group is using "upstream-repo" for | this additional remote in its tools since December 2013. Not that one is better than the other, and although I like to follow git-buildpackage in general, having to change the names on 4000+ remotes on dozens of developers' machine is annoying. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
