* Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> [250107 08:39]: > 1/ https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/9 > (see mr9.patch attached if you don't want to look up on the web) > > We had a couple of revisions already and it seems fine to me to merge > this, if anyone has valid objections (i.e. with good rationale), now is > the time to raise them. You might want to look the closed comments > on the above merge request to see whether your concerns have been > discussed already. > > This change basically adds the recommendation to use "upstreamvcs" as the > name of the "git remote" to access the upstream repository and it also > documents the possibility to merge the upstream commits in the > "upstream/latest" branch (as proposed by gbp import-orig > --upstream-vcs-tag) when your workflow is to import the upstream tarball.
The name for the remote could easily have been "upstream" like various packages are already set up and documented today. But apparently gbp picked the IMO unwieldly name in the meantime? Meh. But what's done is done, I guess. We'll see who will adopt that name. Chris
