On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:59:26AM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar > > Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
Extremely, unless your workflow requires using something else to get the upstream tarball from the archive (among other less important requirements). Though many people don't use d/gbp.conf for this, with predictable results when someone else than those people tries to build the repo. > > and cannot guess your branch naming system. > > I haven't checked, but in an ideal world gbp would default to the same > values for these as described in DEP-14. In that same ideal world, we'd > have DEP-14 out of Draft status. Yes, and all the teams would use it in that ideal world. There is a bug reported against gbp for the first of these points AFAIK. That would be a backwards incompatible change though I guess. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
