On Sun, 2024-10-06 at 09:45 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: [...] > I agree in principle, but I wonder if going through the effort of > introducing a new source package 'signify-mail' and removing the current > 'signify' will give us anything beyond doing the QA package upload to > rename the binary package. > > The only advantage I can identify seems to be if the 'signify-openbsd' > source package would then be able to be renamed to 'signify'. But is > that possible? Are there any earlier examples of re-use of the same > source package name, but for a different package? [...]
There are 2 prominent examples: - chromium (the original chromium is now chromium-bsu) - git (the oriignal git is now gnuit) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
