On Sat, 2024-10-05 at 12:31 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: [...] > This will rename the binary package to 'signify-mail', as suggested in > the first bug report above, and add a 'signify (<< 1.14-8~)' Replaces > header. > > Is anything more required here? [...]
Yes, I think you should also rename the source package signify. Debbugs doesn't always properly distinguish source and binary package names. This goes badly when there are a source and binary package of the same name, but the binary package is built by a different source package. And of course, a situation like that is also confusing to humans. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
