On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:31:33 +0900, Simon Richter <s...@debian.org> wrote: >On 10/7/24 16:58, Marc Haber wrote: >> I also see trouble in the archive when we have old signify in older >> distributions and new signify in unstable and testing. Without having >> any technical justification for that, I would probably go ahead to >> rename signify to signify-mail, leaving signify-openbsd named that way >> until the old signify source package has aged out of the archive >> completely and was moved to archive.d.o. > >The correct approach is one release with a transitional package, pulling >the new package in, and one release with the name unused (so the >transitional package is listed in Obsolete/Local).
I was actually talking about source package names, not binary. Greetings Marc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
