I agree. Speaking just for myself, I have at least one other 32-bit system that currently runs Debian 11, and I'd prefer to not just upgrade it and hope it works as a means of testing whether or not it's supported. If the distinction between "supported" and "not supported" is going to come down to specific assembler-level instructions, it would seem that that wont tell most people anything.
A list of processors doesn't have to be exhaustive. It only has to list whatever has been reported as known to work or not. Feedback from the popularity-contest package might be useful here. This is essentially the way that flashrom does it. They tell you what they know for sure, and what's a guess, and what they don't know. After that, they've done the best they can do and you have to make a good decision. --J Sent from my mobile device. ________________________________ From: RL <richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2023 04:45 To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Illegal Instruction Using sudo in Bookworm on i686 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> writes: Is there an page that tabulates release name and detailed hardware baseline - if i want to know "what release can run on a computer with X processor", is is there somewwhere i go to research that? it would be useful for release-notes to link to such a page
