Quoting Vincent Bernat (2019-05-21 09:40:38) > ❦ 19 mai 2019 23:53 -04, Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org>: > > > >> As promised, I'd like to start a discussion on whether we > > >> want to recommend using the dh command from debhelper as our > > >> preferred build system. > > > > Sean> For those who haven't seen it, the original author of dh, Joey > > Sean> Hess, has just published a blog post relevant to the > > Sean> discussion we're having: > > > > I've read the blog post. > > > > I think Joey's points are very consistent with our discussion here. > > Is there an example of a package where dh cannot be used? Making 96% > of packages simpler and 4% of packages moderately more complex seems > to be a good argument to uniformize our packaging practices towards > dh.
I guess the answer to your question is "no" but please beware that this thread is about what is _convenient_ (for the package maintainer and/or for the majority of Debian), not what is _possible_, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
