On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, at 20:16, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > On 22/10/13 09:18, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > I would suggest: caching-name-server > > *-dns-server would be better, as it is specific enough to avoid name > collision in the future.
JFTR that should not be any name collisions as the "name server" is term defined in RFC1034 and used in all DNS standards out there. Not that it matters now when the idea was those was rejected (see my other proposal). O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1382599821.2454.37873421.191a2...@webmail.messagingengine.com
