On 22/10/13 14:43, Ondřej Surý wrote: > The proposed names are: > > authoritative-name-server - authoritative domain name server > recursive-name-server - recursive domain name server > > Any objections?
If you depend on one of these, what functionality can you rely on having "out of the box"? What packages do you expect to benefit from having these virtual packages to depend on? For a recursive name server, is the expected functionality "it listens on port 53, and will resolve DNS names without relying on any non-local, non-authoritative DNS servers" or something? For an authoritative name server, all I can think of is "listens on port 53 and does something" - or is there some portable location where packages are expected to be able to put zone files, or what? Are simple DNS forwarders like dnsmasq, which have simplistic authoritative resolution for a LAN and pass the rest to an external recursive nameserver, expected to provide a virtual package? S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52668bb8.7040...@debian.org