On 10/24/2013 12:30 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, at 20:16, Octavio Alvarez wrote: >> On 22/10/13 09:18, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: >>> I would suggest: caching-name-server >> >> *-dns-server would be better, as it is specific enough to avoid name >> collision in the future. > > JFTR that should not be any name collisions as the "name server" is term > defined in RFC1034 and used in all DNS standards out there. Not that it > matters now when the idea was those was rejected (see my other > proposal).
RFC1034 and all DNS standards define "name server" within their own scope. Debian has a lot of software that do not belong to the IETF scope. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/526d509a.5050...@alvarezp.ods.org
