2013/7/19 Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org>: > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> writes: > >> Popcon however speaks a completely different language: > >>> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=upstart >>> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=systemd > >> Currently 64 counted installations for upstart versus 1604 counted >> installations for systemd with a significant drop for upstart shortly >> after it surged just when upstart in Debian was updated to 1.6. > > I believe the equivalent systemd package to the upstart package is the > systemd-sysv package, so 174 rather than 1604 is perhaps the better number > to use. This is just for people who dropped SysV-Init for systemd, since systemd-sysv provides compatibility symlinks for a sd-only install. People who tried systemd will obviously need the systemd package (and then adjust GRUB to boot using sd). So, 1604 would be a valid number. (But I also don't understand the massive drop in upstart installs - did something happen?) Cheers, Matthias
-- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caknhny-u2jmapfsaf+o1sdldivgverzfp25_ocpyt0zehvr...@mail.gmail.com
