On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 09:04:53AM +0200, Ond??ej Surı wrote: >> I have an idea ??? maybe we could have a pseudo-package called >> "please-improve" (or whatever name we pick), where people can reassign >> bugreports which they feel they are unable to handle. This pseudo-bug would >> be monitored by some virtuous people[*] better in handling poor bugreports >> and they would work with submitter to improve the bug report, and then >> reassign it back. > > The downside of this approach is that you lose track of the affected > component and version information (or at least this information is no > longer mechanically queryable if it is present at all). So instead maybe > tags could be used to convey this information. Indeed there are already > some tags that that partly address your needs. For instance, "moreinfo" > is to mark bugs that lack important information and "help" is a signal > that you are not going to fix it. To get a cleaner view on your bugs, > you can then use usercategories to sort bugs with tags moreinfo and help > to the end of your report page. For more information see > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-request#user
Maybe using affects bug-improve is the way to go. Bastien > > Hope this helps > > Helmut > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130527080454.ga22...@alf.mars > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAbhpTm=8jy0gpedafacjboeq6qjpocxtr4qre5n8v_...@mail.gmail.com
