On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I think that such a field would be meaningful only to sort upon it, > and go looking for sorting of multiple valued fields seems to be > looking for trouble to me.
Since tags don't sort, they segregate, you just choose based on the first one that matches, so it's no real trouble. [The debbugs example with my user is one way you can do things.] > Sounds like hackish, doesn't it? The advantage is it works now, works with methods that are known to work, and doesn't require a whole set of new control methods to interact with the field. > Anyhow, another point for preferring a non-user priority tag is that > you don't need to set a user, which IMO makes a lot easier to deal > with bug reports since you don't risk to forget what the "right" > user for the tag/category you're setting is (which frequently > happens to me). You'd have to have a user; it could be a visible one by using [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], but implementing something like this that is necessarily a personal (or small group of people) preference in a way that can't be made personal is a waste of time, AFAIC. Don Armstrong -- o punish me for my contempt of authority, Fate has made me an authority myself -- Albert Einstein http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
