On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:09:43AM -0700, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:38 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:57:54AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > > Kevin Bube wrote: > > > > What about switching to dvdrtools? I think this project was > > > > started to solve the frequently recurring arguments about the > > > > licensing and the device adressing scheme cdrtools use. > > > > > > dvdrtools are currently in non-free (so not part of Debian at all) > > > and therefore not a solution/replacement > > > > I completely fail to see any logic here: > > * cdrtools, obviously completely non-free, is in main > > what? you think if it is non-GPL than it should go to non-free? This is > nonsense. And, please, don't tell me that CDDL is less free than > 3-clause BSD, etc. Its OSI approved, therefore it is *free* license.
APSL 1.2 too is OSI approved. That doesn't make it a *free* license. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
