On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:39 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Erast Benson wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:38 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > I completely fail to see any logic here: > > > * cdrtools, obviously completely non-free, is in main > > > > what? you think if it is non-GPL than it should go to non-free? This > > is nonsense. > > No. The primary issue is that the mixture of a GPL+CDDL work creates a > work that cannot be distributed by anyone else but the copyright > holder.
It seems to be an offtopic here, but could you please elaborate a little bit further, which particular statement of which license prevents it? Erast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
