On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:38 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:57:54AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Kevin Bube wrote: > > > What about switching to dvdrtools? I think this project was > > > started to solve the frequently recurring arguments about the > > > licensing and the device adressing scheme cdrtools use. > > > > dvdrtools are currently in non-free (so not part of Debian at all) > > and therefore not a solution/replacement > > I completely fail to see any logic here: > * cdrtools, obviously completely non-free, is in main
what? you think if it is non-GPL than it should go to non-free? This is nonsense. And, please, don't tell me that CDDL is less free than 3-clause BSD, etc. Its OSI approved, therefore it is *free* license. I'd like to see current Debian leaders to comment on this *political* issue and stop minority discrimination right there. > * dvdrtools, a fork of the last GPLed version, is in non-free dvdrtools - totally useless effort. Besides, its known to be buggy and linux-only which is against Debian philosophy therefore should never be in main. Please, reconsider and instead consolidate your efforts with current cdrtools project. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
