On 05/02/14 at 22:41 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Colin Watson dixit: > > >("Decide any technical matter where Developers' jurisdictions overlap"). > > I think it is not up to the d-i people to decide on the init system > anyway – especially as not d-i but debootstrap is the canonical way > to install Debian… and debootstrap goes by whatever ftp-masters put > into the override files, and whatever package dependencies and meta > information (such as Essential: yes) there are. > > So, “jurisdiction overlaps” seems to fit quite well.
As far as I remember, I don't think that any of the d-i maintainers, debootstrap maintainers, ftpmasters, or sysvinit maintainers have claimed that it was their sole jurisdiction to decide on the default init system. So I agree that there's jurisdiction overlap. Also, given that: The Project Leader may: 4. Make any decision for whom noone else has responsibility. and: The Project Leader may: 1. Appoint Delegates or delegate decisions to the Technical Committee. The Leader may define an area of ongoing responsibility or a specific decision and hand it over to another Developer or to the Technical Committee. Once a particular decision has been delegated and made the Project Leader may not withdraw that delegation; however, they may withdraw an ongoing delegation of particular area of responsibility. I would be very happy, if felt necessary by the Secretary, to delegate that decision to the Technical Committee. Lucas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature