Nikolaus Rath writes ("Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution"):
> It is not at all clear to me why the CTTE so desperately wants to
> automatically defer to a GR in their resolution. If there is consensus
> to defer to a GR with simple majority among the CTTE, surely it would be
> easy enough to revoke or change the resolution if/when a GR has actually
> happened?Firstly, it is much easier to get consensus on this in the TC now while the question of in which direction such a GR might want to override the TC is far from clear. Doing it now avoids the danger of backsliding. Secondly, I think it's undesirable to have any period of time during which a GR's decision would not have de jure authority. Thanks, Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21236.58422.662668.377...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
