On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:39:34PM +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> (2014-02-05): > > The only people who might reasonably be described as vaguely current > > maintainers of parts of d-i whom I can immediately find on a quick > > scan of the early parts of this bug are Wouter and myself; Tollef also > > contributed a good deal in the past, and I may have missed one or two. > > But I don't think any of these people have been acting as d-i > > maintainers here. People like Cyril and Christian, who would be more > > obvious candidates for such a label, have not commented on this bug. > > I'd like to mention a few things: > - TC's opinion (not d-i people's) was queried by Paul. > - d-i maintainers were neither asked anything, or put in the loop at > any point.
Just to clarify things, I wasn't criticising you or anyone else in d-i for not contributing to this bug, either directly or by implication; just stating a fact in response to the earlier confusion. > - Given the incredible amount of mails on that bug, I think it's quite > reasonable not to expect us to jump into that train out of the blue, > especially uninvited. I think this is indeed entirely appropriate. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140207145224.gd2...@riva.ucam.org
