On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:08:35PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > The big question, I think, is whether section 6.3.6 of the > constitution has been satisfied. The project is still clearly working > on solutions, but at a slower pace than some may desire. See this for > a recent example: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00106.html
Various developers certainly continue to work enthusiastically on their preferred approaches, but that's not really the same as "efforts to resolve [the issue] via consensus". I would say that a couple of years of vehement debate spread across various mailing lists with developers settling into increasingly entrenched positions on all sides is rather the opposite of movement towards a consensus position. No doubt this would be for the secretary to adjudicate, though, under 7.1(3). -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140205223823.gb3...@riva.ucam.org
