On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:08:50PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:13:19AM +0200, Stefan Huehner wrote: > > > Package: python-gdchart > > > Followup-For: Bug #369116 > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > as i've seen no progress or comment on this bug? > > > > > > Are there any objections to removing python-gdchart? > > Sorry the the late response. > > Yes, I object to removing python-gdchart, as it is *not* binary > compatible with python-gdchart2, and is used by moinmoin.
If had only checked reverse dependencies in the archive (on amd64,i386) and had found none. I've rechecked and can find no depencencies listed ad the moinmoin packages in the archive now. So i missed this one as is seems no to be explicitely stated. > > > Who is this "we", by the way, that wants gd1 removed from the archive > before etch? > > I am the maintainer of the the library itself and several libraries > depending on it. Where can I learn more on this initiative? I started questioning about a possible gd1 removal on debian-qa [1] some time ago and have had no negative responses and no information from you (as the maintainer) since then. As you had been cc'ed by Martin Michlmayer in one of the mails.. > > I am not against such initiative, but might have insight like the above > about obstacles on the path to reaching that goal. I'm happy for any insight you could give on these path. Especially as you do not seem to reject the goal, only the path :) Regards, Stefan [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/05/msg00033.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
