On 5/16/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, if i understand correctly, there should be definitely no problems in moving to more recent GTKDFB libraries, right (no conflicts with GTKX pavkages) ? do we all agree about moving to 2.9.0 (needs minor patches) or CVS snapshot dated 2006-03-26 (previous to 2.9.0 but compiles "out of repo") ? GTK <= 2.9.0 requires the following libraries
I think it does not matter that much to us if it is a snapshot or 2.9.0, but I think that 2.9.0 would help us because we will not be alone on this ground (others might face different problems with 2.9.0, but there are less chances of that happening with a cvs snapshot). As the debian packaging system allows patching before building, I would opt for 2.9.0.
glib-2.0 >= 2.10.1 atk >= 1.0.1 pango >= 1.9.0 cairo >= 1.1.6
Do these change for 2.9.0? -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
