On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 18:42 +0300, Eddy Petrişor a écrit : > > > So the questions are: > > - Is it OK for the GTK+GNOME team to have D-I people (and maybe with > > the help of some gtk/gnome people) build some udebs for GTK > > _with_the_DFB_ backend, as it is now for the 2.0.9 version? > > Sure, no objection with that > > > > So, in English, the main question is if the gtk/gnome people are ok > > with the fact that now, the lead of developing gtk packages will be > > taken by d-i people? > > Building some udeb is not exactly taking the lead of the GTK packages, > right?
Well, my proposal was to use the same packaging infrastructure for both the official 2.8 gtk and the .udeb producing 2.9+ gtk packages, add the necessary stuff to produce the new -directfb packages, and disable the build of the normal ones. it is indeed not taking the lead, but the experience may benefit the gtk team later on. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
