Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 5/16/06, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 18:42 +0300, Eddy Petrişor a écrit :
> So the questions are:
> - Is it OK for the GTK+GNOME team to have D-I people (and maybe with
> the help of some gtk/gnome people) build some udebs for GTK
> _with_the_DFB_ backend, as it is now for the 2.0.9 version?
Sure, no objection with that
Good.
So, if i understand correctly, there should be definitely no problems in
moving to more recent GTKDFB libraries, right (no conflicts with GTKX
pavkages) ? do we all agree about moving to 2.9.0 (needs minor patches)
or CVS snapshot dated 2006-03-26 (previous to 2.9.0 but compiles "out of
repo") ?
GTK <= 2.9.0 requires the following libraries
glib-2.0 >= 2.10.1
atk >= 1.0.1
pango >= 1.9.0
cairo >= 1.1.6
We already have correct glib, atk and pango, but we need to repackage a
newer cairo compiling it with the DirectFB backend enable against DFB
0.9.24 (the detailed GTKDFB packaging process is described here [1]).
Who's going to do this? in the case we can't do this by ourselves, could
the debian-gnome team, who nicely offered to help us, support us?
friendly
Attilio
[1] http://www.directfb.org/wiki/index.php/Projects:GTK_on_DirectFB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
