On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:35:08PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> wrote (Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:04:23 +0100): > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 12:46:31AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > This was tagged as debian/1.149 despite the fact we've been using the > > > version number without a debian/ prefix since forever for d-i packages, > > > which has been recorded in (almost, see recent commits in > > > network-console and systemd-boot-installer for outliers) all > > > repositories via debian/gbp.conf; that is (and was at the time > > > debian/1.149 got tagged) the case for this package, so it would be best > > > if whatever tooling is used (dgit apparently) would respect that… > > > > Although dgit created the tag, it doesn't push it to salsa and it > > doesn't care what gets pushed to salsa - it does its own tracking > > elsewhere. This was my fault for forgetting that d-i uses a pre-DEP14 > > tagging convention when I pushed - sorry about that. > > > > I've pushed a tag matching the d-i convention now and deleted the old > > tag from salsa. > > I just noticed that network-console is suffering from the same problem ...
Also fixed, thanks. -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
