Hi Colin, Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> wrote (Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:04:23 +0100): > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 12:46:31AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > This was tagged as debian/1.149 despite the fact we've been using the > > version number without a debian/ prefix since forever for d-i packages, > > which has been recorded in (almost, see recent commits in > > network-console and systemd-boot-installer for outliers) all > > repositories via debian/gbp.conf; that is (and was at the time > > debian/1.149 got tagged) the case for this package, so it would be best > > if whatever tooling is used (dgit apparently) would respect that… > > Although dgit created the tag, it doesn't push it to salsa and it > doesn't care what gets pushed to salsa - it does its own tracking > elsewhere. This was my fault for forgetting that d-i uses a pre-DEP14 > tagging convention when I pushed - sorry about that. > > I've pushed a tag matching the d-i convention now and deleted the old > tag from salsa.
I just noticed that network-console is suffering from the same problem ... Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
