On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 12:46:31AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > This was tagged as debian/1.149 despite the fact we've been using the > version number without a debian/ prefix since forever for d-i packages, > which has been recorded in (almost, see recent commits in > network-console and systemd-boot-installer for outliers) all > repositories via debian/gbp.conf; that is (and was at the time > debian/1.149 got tagged) the case for this package, so it would be best > if whatever tooling is used (dgit apparently) would respect that…
Although dgit created the tag, it doesn't push it to salsa and it doesn't care what gets pushed to salsa - it does its own tracking elsewhere. This was my fault for forgetting that d-i uses a pre-DEP14 tagging convention when I pushed - sorry about that. I've pushed a tag matching the d-i convention now and deleted the old tag from salsa. -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
