also sprach Bernelle Verster <bernel...@gmail.com> [2015-11-16 00:56 +1300]: > My personal opinion is also, that these three proposals are pretty > much the same, and the only thing stopping them from converging is > ego.
The reason I support the no-delegation (which I don't see as equal to the other proposals) is not ego. I do not take credit for this proposal. I merely consider it better suited for the nature of dc-orga in the light of our experiences, it's much leaner, and comes without any downsides over the other two approaches. Conversely, a well-made delegation also won't hurt, it's just going to take more time to get there, and adds an additional entity without obvious benefits, and comes with a bit of inertia. If the team wants to go this way (again), my "ego" won't stand in the way. More important than the question of whether we need delegates or not is IMHO the bid decision and decision arbitration. I'd like to think that the proposed "annually elected per-conference bid decision committee acting as quasi-ctte" is better aligned in terms of motivations/interests than fixed delegates arbitrating when they see fit, and I hope we can kick off the election process for this soon. The bid submission deadline is closer than we think and it's about time we get in touch with the potentially bid teams. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16 DebConf17 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf17
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
