On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Tassia Camoes Araujo <tas...@debian.org> wrote:
> I really don't like this approach. People who have a problem with video would > refrain from participating if they need to convince us that they have a good > reason. Yes video is important, but IMHO we shouldn't do it on the cost of > risking to disrespect the speakers' right to choose how to use their image. I am unclear on who would be willing to go on stage, yet not have at least their voice recorded. I'd like to turn this argument around, though. We are doing a _ton_ of work in a myriad on ways and at least some of us consider the videos an integral part of the whole experience. The default should be to share information. > Moreover, this is a problem that does not exist. We don't see people abusing > from the fact that they can opt-out from video coverage. I don't have the > numbers, but following the video team for years, I know that only a few people > request for not be covered by video, and I don't think this compromises the > quality of the conference. > IMHO We can make it the default and explain the importance of video for remote > participation, but a simple "I'm sorry but I don't feel comfortable with that" > would be a good enough reason for not being recorded. If it's opt-out and people are required to give a reason for why they don't want to be discovered, what are we even discussing if we all agree, anyway? Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
