Hi, On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:06:23AM -0500, Tassia Camoes Araujo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:43:27PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > below are my own opinions, I am not speaking for the content team as a > > whole. > > > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:21:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > > Four bits of feedback: > > > > > > First, are we sure we want to invite talks and leave it up entirely > > > to the presenter, whether they can be broadcast by video? Shouldn't > > > it be much more that we require permission to broadcast by video all > > > presentations (not necessarily debates or ad-hoc stuff) and will > > > make exceptions only if given a good reason? > > > > I tend to agree with you here. Remote participation is a very important > > part and we should make it clear that livestream and recordings are > > absolutely supposed to be the default. > > > I really don't like this approach. People who have a problem with video would > refrain from participating if they need to convince us that they have a good > reason. Yes video is important, but IMHO we shouldn't do it on the cost of > risking to disrespect the speakers' right to choose how to use their image. > > Moreover, this is a problem that does not exist. We don't see people abusing > from the fact that they can opt-out from video coverage. I don't have the > numbers, but following the video team for years, I know that only a few people > request for not be covered by video, and I don't think this compromises the > quality of the conference.
How about audio plus screengrab of the presenter's display? In any case, as long as the default is "record and stream video", that is ok I think. Michael _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
