also sprach Margarita Manterola <margamanter...@gmail.com> [2015-02-14 19:21 +0100]: > This was briefly discussed on IRC. It's unclear if we want to send one > mail/announcement or two. I think one is better, but I don't have a > very strong opinion. We need to decide this, write the text/s and > send it/them out.
Here's an argument for two separate mails: a separate call-for-registrations can be made more exciting if we already have a few "highlights" to advertise as a result of the CfP. People *can* register early, but if we don't make that official, we don't run the risk of possibly having to send a second mail later on reminding people to register (which makes the event appear unpopular, even though it might just be due to timing). -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town or Montreal? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
